Shortly after Khizir Khan took the podium at the Democrat National Convention in Philadelphia to scold Donald Trump for declaring that he would prohibit all Muslim immigration until a method could be found to separate the wheat from the chaff, Khan, an immigration lawyer, took down his website.
“Khan has a vested interest in a pay-to-play business in which wealthy Muslims can buy their way to a green card with an investment. It’s the old EB 5 play and it’s legal. So why scrub your website? Sounds like a legal con,” says a prominent local Tea Party organizer in New Jersey.
This news comes to us from Breitbart.com
Here is some of what they have uncovered:
Khizir Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that Democrats and their allies media wide have been using to hammer GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump, has deleted his law firm’s website from the Internet.
This development is significant, as his website proved—as Breitbart News and others have reported—that he financially benefits from unfettered pay-to-play Muslim migration into America.
A snapshot of his now deleted website, as captured by the Wayback Machine, which takes snapshots archiving various websites on the Internet, shows that as a lawyer he engages in procurement of EB5 immigration visas and other “Related Immigration Services.”
The website is completely removed from the Internet, and instead directs visitors to the URL at which it once was to a page parking the URL run by GoDaddy.
The EB5 program, which helps wealthy foreigners usually from the Middle East essentially buy their way into America, is fraught with corruption. U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has detailed such corruption over the past several months, and in February issued a blistering statement about it.
“Maybe it is only here on Capitol Hill—on this island surrounded by reality—that we can choose to plug our ears and refuse to listen to commonly accepted facts,” Grassley said in a statement earlier this year. “The Government Accountability Office, the media, industry experts, members of congress, and federal agency officials, have concurred that the program is a serious problem with serious vulnerabilities. Allow me to mention a few of the flaws.”
Grassley’s statement even noted that the program Khan celebrated on his website has posed national security risks.
“There are also classified reports that detail the national security, fraud and abuse. Our committee has received numerous briefings and classified documents to show this side of the story,” Grassley said in the early February 2016 statement.
“The enforcement arm of the Department of Homeland Security wrote an internal memo that raises significant concerns about the program. One section of the memo outlines concerns that it could be used by Iranian operatives to infiltrate the United States [Ed.: we learned today that the Obama administration sent a planeload of cash to Iran in exchange for the release of some Iranian-American citizens being held captive by Iran]. The memo identifies seven main areas of program vulnerability, including the export of sensitive technology, economic espionage, use by foreign government agents and terrorists, investment fraud, illicit finance and money laundering.”
Khan spoke alongside his wife Ghazala Khan at the Democratic National Convention last week in Philadelphia, and they were honoring their son U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan—a hero who lost his life to a suicide bomber in Iraq in 2004. On behalf of Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president, Khizir Khan ripped into Donald Trump’s policies on immigration—specifically bashing his plan to bar Muslim migration from regions afflicted with rampant terrorism into America temporarily until the United States can figure out what’s going on.
Khan even brought out a pocket Constitution, claiming inaccurately that Trump’s plans were unconstitutional. That’s not true, as Congress has already granted such power to the president under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952—allowing the president to bar migration of any alien or class of aliens the president sees as a threat to the United States for any reason at any time. Such a class of aliens could be Muslims, or it could be people from a specific region of the world, or any other class—such as someone’s race, weight, height, age, national origin, religion, or anything else.
The media, along with Hillary Clinton and her supporters throughout the Democratic Party establishment, has pushed the line of attack against Trump for days. Now on Tuesday, President Barack Obama has said that Trump is “unfit” to serve as President over the matter. Even a group of anti-Trump congressional Republicans has gone after Trump on the matter.
But as Breitbart News and other new media have exposed Khan’s various deep political and legal connections to the Clintons—and to Muslim migration—the attack line has crumbled. Now, with Khan deleting his website in an apparent effort to hide his biographical information, the attack is falling apart even more.
What’s perhaps interesting is that also on this website that he has now deleted, Khan revealed that he spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation.
Hillary Clinton, despite the repeated urging of Trump, has refused to return the Clinton Cash money to the Saudis. What’s more, Hogan Lovells also did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her illicit home-brew email server that the FBI director called “extremely careless” in handling classified information.
What’s more, the entire mainstream has proven negligence with regard to this matter as none of them even thought to look into this Khan guy’s law practice before bandying him about as some kind of magic elixir that cures the country of Trump.
Thank goodness for alternative, Conservative media.
Now we must ask, though no great fan of Donald J. Trump, what exactly did he say that was so wrong that earned him the label of “Gold Star Mother attacker”? Trump noted the obvious, that Mrs. Khan stood silently beside her husband as he denounced Trump. Mr. Khan cited the 2004 (that’s 16 years ago) death of Capt. Humayun Khan, who was killed in a suicide bomb attack in Iraq. This, he declared, was reason enough not to brush all Muslims with the same brush.
That is not what Trump intends in his immigration plan. What’s more, his “attack” on the Gold Star mother consisted of noting that the wife stood complacently silent while her husband did all the shouting. It was difficult not to notice. This behavior is consistent with the role Muslim wives play in the Muslim family – seen but not heard. The husband can beat his wife black and blue if she criticizes or argues with him.
Obama declared that Trump is unfit to be President of the United States. That may or may not be. However, that’s hardly a judgment for Obama to make, who has bowed to every dictator and potentate on the planet, re-established relations with Cuba, decimated our military so that we would not be able withstand an attack by either China and/or Russia, gave birth to ISIS, and made us one of the most economically “unfit” Western nations in the world.
Unfit? And let us not get started on Hillary Clinton’s unfitness for the presidency. We’ll save that for another day.
Muslim activists do not want us to paint all Muslims with the same brush. Well, let us turn that request around. How about the Muslims not paint all Americans with the same brush? Not all American women sport about with everything hanging out, especially in the summer (although I’m sorry to report that many, even those over 50, do). Not all American women paint their faces thick with make-up.
Not all Americans are lushes, boozing it up at every turn, although you couldn’t tell by the rate at which closed supermarkets are becoming liquormarkets. That’s not a good sign when more Americans are buying alcohol than food. I was in one the other day, for a grand opening. The store provided aisle after aisle of wine, beer, and a host of harder alcoholic beverages. Plus, they had a “Munchies Aisle” and a classroom for wine-tasting education.
Whatever pays the taxes, I guess.
Not all Americans love the profane, pornographic movies Hollywood is pumping out. The latest feature film is “Imperium,” starring Daniel Radcliffe as an undercover FBI agent (?) out to expose a right-wing extremist group. But many of them do.
Last night, I covered a Night Out Against Crime event. I saw a few white people, a token number of blacks, and an abundance of Muslims, as well as a bench filled with young men of dubious ancestry on the far side of the park who looked like they were engaged in a drug deal. Notwithstanding the crimes which the Islamic extremists commit against Americans and whom the so-called “peaceful” Muslims mask with their numbers, they’re pretty much in favor of law and order. In fact, more law and order than would be legal under our Constitution.
Nevertheless, if they’re really for law and order, and improved morals, they’re standing with the wrong political party. Khan shook the U.S. Constitution in his hands, challenging Trump to read it. Given Trump’s age, he was probably required to read it sometime in later elementary school or high school. Obama, on the other hand, also studied with designs of destroying it.
The Republican National Convention paid tribute to fallen law enforcement officers. The Democratic National Convention paid tribute to fallen criminals, criminals who had resisted arrest by law enforcement and lost. Khazir was standing at the wrong podium and on the wrong soap-box.
Are the Muslims right that Americans need to clean up their moral act? Without a doubt. But they’re not going to achieve that goal with an AK-47 or a mass immigration of Muslims who will overturn our demographics and bind us into the Ummah. Maybe porno movies are a problem (and who brought this scourge upon us but Democrat-backing, Marxist Hollywood), but they would ban all movies, altogether – just to be on the safe side.
We’re already being overwhelmed with a regulatory bureaucracy that imposes its law on everything from bicycle helmets to shower heads to barbecues, lawn mowers, and air conditioners. We have the Democrats and RINO Republicans to thank for the current size of our government, going all the way back to Theodore Roosevelt.
We don’t need a Sharia-law government to dictate what’s left of our personal lives. Americans may need to clean up their act, but even if they are boozing, drug-addled, porn-goggling, boob-bobbling, foul-mouthed, ignorant idiots, they still love their freedom. The fact that Donald J. Trump is their champion is rather dismaying, if not exactly surprising.
However, since most of the rest of the Republican Party owe their allegiance to George Soros foundations, hold delusional notions of winning minority votes, and would sell their mothers to get elected or re-elected, what choice do average Americans have?
Donald Trump told it like it was regarding the Khan’s appearance at the DNC Convention. What exactly is he supposed to be apologizing for? The GOP, it seems, will do anything to negate the will of the people.
Obviously, they don’t like the U.S. Constitution any better than their Democrat rivals.